Machnovschjina as an epistemologically significant phenomenon
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Machnovschjina as an epistemologically significant phenomenon
Annotation
PII
S258770110011548-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Maria Rakhmaninova 
Occupation: Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Address: 192238, Saint-Petersburg, Fuchika str., 15
Edition
Abstract

The article considers the phenomenon of Makhnovshchina as significant for academic humanitarian knowledge and contemporary socio-political reflection. The insurgent army of Ukraine is studied from the point of view of the existential and epistemological specifics of its attitudes, which determined the military tactics of the army and its ability to form productive alternative scenarios of sociality. The main objective of the article is to make the first attempt at an interdisciplinary philosophical study of unique historical material, poorly covered in the Soviet and post-Soviet traditions, in order to deepen and detail the understanding of the political dispositions of the Civil War of 1918-1921 beyond historical facts. The study uses general scientific methods, among which: hermeneutic, linguistic and content analysis prevails, as well as the idiographic method, the synthesis method and the interpretation method. The study was carried out on extensive textual material, including both the primary sources of various testimonies about the events in question (diary, documentary, poetic, etc.), and the works of historians and political scientists who studied the factual side of the problem under consideration.

Keywords
philosophy of history, epistemology, Civil war, anarchism, peasantry, Makhnovshchina, RPAU, insurrection
Received
01.07.2020
Date of publication
02.10.2020
Number of purchasers
19
Views
1995
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article
Additional services for all issues for 2020

Publication text not found

References

1. Аrshinov P. Istoriya makhnovskogo dvizheniya (1918-1921). – M.: TERRА; «Knizhnaya lavka - RTR», 1996. 496 s.

2. Аshakhmanov P. Makhno i ego taktika // Voennoe znanie, 1921, №18.

3. Bad'yu А. Manifest filosofii. – Spb.: Machina, 2012.190 s.

4. Bauman Z. «Аktual'nost' KHolokosta». 316 s.

5. Belash А.V., Belash V.F. Dorogi Nestora Makhno. Istoricheskoe povestvovanie. – Kiev: RVTS «Proza», 1993. 592 s.

6. Bergson А. Tvorcheskaya ehvolyutsiya. – M.: Kuchkovo pole, 2006. 384 s.

7. Volin V. Neizvestnaya revolyutsiya (1917-1921).-M.: NPTS «Praksis», 2005. 606 s.

8. Volkovinskij M.N. Makhno i ego krakh. – M.: VZPI, 1991. 247 s.

9. Golovanov V. Nestor Makhno. – M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2013. 482 s.

10. Esenin S.А. Sorokoust / Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 7 t. – M.: Nauka; Golos, 1995—2002, t. 2.

11. Esenin S.А. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 7 t. – M.: Nauka; Golos, 1995—2002, t. 2.

12. Kropotkin P.А. Vzaimnaya pomoshh' kak faktor ehvolyutsii. – M.: Redaktsiya zhurnala «Samoobrazovanie», 2007. 161 s.

13. Liotar Zh.-F. Doklad / Bad'yu А. Manifest filosofii. – 2-e izd. – SPb: Machina, 2012. 190 s.

14. Mate G. https://drgabormate.com/topic/addiction/, 04.03.18.

15. Makhno N. Аzbuka anarkhista. Vospominaniya. – M.: PROZАiK, 2013

16. Skirda А. Sotsializm intellektualov. YAn Vatslav Makhajskij. Razoblachitel' sotsializma, marksizma i samogo Marksa. – Parizh: Gromada, 2003. 130 s.

17. Fejerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoj teorii poznaniya. http://psylib.org.ua/books/feyer01/txt16.htm, 05.03.18.

18. Fejerabend P. Proshhaj, razum! – M.: АST: Аstrel', 2010. 477 s.

19. Fromm Eh. Аnatomiya chelovecheskoj destruktivnosti. – M.: АST, 2015. 618 s.

20. Shmitt K. Teoriya partizana. – M.: Praksis, 2007. 301 s.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate